![]() When I start, I try three times to send a specific command just to have it echo back. I'm trying to figure out why I might lose track of the process. In the past, I've found this to be pretty fickle to do in other languages, and it looks to be just as annoying in. I have to interact with an external, interative, command-line application. Slow things down, develop incrementally, and your sanity might be saved. There's a lot that can go wrong, and many of those things will have you barking up the wrong tree. Then, make individual changes, verifying each one along the way. I strongly recommend you create a WCF Service Application (or WCF Library), run that, add service references to its dummy methods, get everything working with the example project. Not sure how much WCF you know, so this may sound silly, but: is the WCF service running when you attempt to add the service reference? I have added a reference to System.Windows to the project, but I get the same error without it. ![]() at .LoadAndResolutionHandler.HandleAssemblyLoadFailure(AssemblySymbol assemblySymbol)Īt (AssemblyUnit unit)Īt .AssemblyLoader.ProcessWorklist(MetadataLoader metadataLoader, Boolean ignoreErrors)Īt .AssemblyLoader.LoadAssembly(String filePath)Īt .PhoenixAnalysisEngine.AnalyzeInternal()Īt .PhoenixAnalysisEngine.Analyze()Īt .Analyze(Project project, Boolean verboseOutput) Ĭould not resolve reference to System.Windows, Version=2.0.5.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=7cec85d7bea7798e, Retargetable=Yes. The relevant portion of the code analysis log: For this, and only this, project, I get a when trying to run code analysis for the project. I have a regular class library that references a portable class library, both targeting. Language is tricksy and needs weird logic gates. before the bite, before its oblivion in the goring of your soft parts, the speckled lips will curl back in a whinny of excitement. You don't want to see such a mouth up close. Some teeth long for ripping, gleaming wet from black dog gums. Making localized software for Middle Eastern customer was intresting when nobody at the office could even read Arabic script.Īnd don't forget that form of Celtic where exact multiples of a million get their own plural form. Negative numbers might have similar issues.įor added fun, for example in Arabic there are singular, dual and plural forms. What about count = 0? In English 0 gets the plural form, so it'd work, but other languages might not behave the same way.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |